KWAHU CHIEFTAINCY CRISIS: EASTERN REGIONAL HOUSE OF RESTRAINS BFFOUR AKOTO OSEI, 6 OTHERS.
KWAHU CHIEFTAINCY CRISIS: EASTERN REGIONAL HOUSE OF CHIEFS RESTRAINS BAFFOUR AKOTO OSEI, 6 OTHERS"
BY TETTEH ELIZABETH NARKUOR - BABJ28064
STORY SOURCE: GRAPHIC ONLINE1. Does the image accurately represent the headline news?
Yes. The image shows traditional leaders, which aligns with the headline focused on a chieftaincy dispute.
2. What emotions does the image evoke?( Does it create urgency, sympathy or controversy)
The facial expressions are serious and composed, evoking formality and gravity—fitting for a legal/traditional conflict.
3.Is the image manipulated or biased?( Does it frame the story in a particular way)
Not obviously. The use of two different individuals visually balances the story. However, if one is the restrained party and the other is not, the side-by-side presentation could unintentionally suggest equivalency or rivalry.
4. How does the composition affect storytelling?( Consider framing, lighting and focus)
Strong composition. Both chiefs are centered, dressed regally, and well-lit. The clear backgrounds make the image easy to focus on and add cultural weight.
5.Does the image add depth to the story or simply reinforce the headline?
It adds depth. Seeing the chiefs humanizes the story and makes the headline feel more significant and connected to real people.
6.Would a different image change the reader's perception of the news?
Yes. An image of a courtroom or traditional council could shift focus from the individuals to the institutional decision-making.
7. How does the image compare to others covering the same story?
Compared to typical images of chiefs, this one is very formal and dignified, avoiding sensationalism.
8. Is the image culturally or politically significant?(Does it reflect societial biases)
Very much so. The image reflects Ghanaian traditional authority and the political weight such roles carry. It respects societal structures.
SECTION
CAPE COAST: ANOTHER STOREY BUILDING COLLAPSES KILLING ONE WOMAN.
STORY SOURCE: GRAPHIC ONLINE1.Yes. The image clearly depicts the aftermath of a collapsed building, which directly supports the headline.
2.Shock and concern. The damage looks severe, evoking sympathy for victims and concern about infrastructure safety.
3.No manipulation visible. The image seems to be a straightforward photo of the scene.
4.The framing shows the damage dramatically, capturing the chaos and destruction. Lighting and angles draw attention to the broken walls and scattered debris.
5.The image reinforces and adds urgency to the headline. Readers can immediately grasp the seriousness of the collapse.
6.Possibly. An image with emergency responders or mourning family could intensify the emotional response. Conversely, a distant image might dull the impact.
7.This is a typical choice for disaster reporting—raw, real, and close-up.
8.Yes. It subtly critiques infrastructure standards and building regulations in Ghana, especially since this is the second collapse in days.
REWRITE
HISTORY OF THE IRAN- US RELATION: FROM THE 1953 REGIME CHANGE TO TRUMP STRIKES
STORY SOURCE: AI JAZEERA
The United States and Iran tensions have surged to the highest point in decades after president Trump ordered a strike to destroy their nuclear facilities across the Middle Eastern country.
After the revolution led by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khemeini since 1979, the two nations have issues which include Iran’s nuclear ambitions, backing of proxies in the region and US political interference.
Israel Launched a strike to Iran last week claiming the country was developing a nuclear weapon. This attack was launched since they saw Iran as a threat. Israeli also claim that they were not backed or supported by any country but for Trump, he involved the US following the Israeli strikes.
On a Sunday, the UK stricked Iran that involved more than 125 aircrafts and 75 precision bombs. after the attack, the US said the strike devastated Iran’s nuclear sites but Tehran warned it would retaliate.
A timeline of US- Iran Relation since 1953
*In 1953 the US-backed coup and the reinstallation of the Shad.
* In 1957 there was an Atom For Peace. This was Shad’s ambitions for a nuclear powered Iran gained support from the US and other western allies.
*In 1979 there was there Islamic revolution led by Ayatollah Ruhollah.
*In 1980 the US cut diplomatic ties.
*In the 1980 -88, The US backs s Iraqi invasion.
*In the 1984 President Ronald Reagan officially designated Iran as a state sponsor of terror.
*There was an Iran air flight shot down in the 1988.
*In the 1995 the US imposed more sanctions President Bill Clinton ordered a ban on U.S. companies from dealing with Iran.
*There was also the 9/11 Aftermath in 2002 where president George W.Bush in their state of the Union address stated that Iran Axis of evil.
*In 214 Iran had a nuclear deal with President Barack Obama.
*In 2018 Trump withdraws from the nuclear deal.
*In 2020 there was the Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guide Corps Assassinations.
*In the 25 trump wrote a letter to leader Ayatollah negotiating on a nuclear deal and also the bombing of the nuclear facilities in Iran



Good work done
ReplyDeleteThanks
DeleteNice
ReplyDelete